## 1. Introduction

In the following tutorial you will learn how to:

Create periodic boundary conditions with non-conforming boundary mesh

Apply pressure jump between periodic boundaries

Calculate mass flow rate through a boundary

We will investigate mass flow rates obtained in two configurations of the infinite tesla valve. We will create a two-dimensional model with periodic boundary conditions. In the first part of the tutorial, we will calculate flow in the blocking direction of the valve. The flow will be forced by a prescribed pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet boundary of the periodic domain segment. In the second part, we will simulate flow in the opposite direction, by changing the sign of the applied pressure difference. Finally, we will compare the results and the efficiency of the two configurations.

## 2. Create New Project

After opening SimFlow, we will create a new case named *tesla_valve*

Go to

**New**panelProvide name

*tesla_valve*Click

**Create Case**

## 3. Import Geometry - Tesla Valve

Firstly we need to Download Geometry: Tesla_valve

Click

**Import Geometry**Select geometry file

*tesla_valve.step*Click

**Open**

## 4. Geometry - Tesla Valve

After importing geometry, it will appear in the 3D window.

Click

**Fit View**to fit geometry in the view

## 5. Translate Geometry - Tesla Valve (I)

The geometry is a three-dimensional volume. However, in this tutorial, we will work on a two-dimensional case. To prepare this kind of mesh, we will use the *Plate* (2D plane) base mesh, which should cut through the 3D volume. Therefore, we need to adjust the location of the geometry so that its center will be located on the XY plane.

Expand the

*Options*list for*tesla valve*

(you can also right-click on geometry name)Select

*Translate*

## 6. Translate Geometry - Tesla Valve (II)

Now we have to specify coordinates for the translation.

Set translation vector

*Translation Vector \({\sf [m]}\)**0**0**-2.5e-03*Click

**Translate**

## 7. Preview Geometry

After the geometry is scaled we will not be able to see it in the 3D graphics panel. We can adjust the view by using the **Fit View** button.

Select

**Fit View**

## 8. Creating Face Groups (I)

In this fluid flow simulation, we are dealing with an internal flow problem. The imported geometry determines the bounds of the fluid domain. To inform the program where the boundaries of the inlet and outlet mesh should be created, we will use the *Face Groups* options. *Face Groups* can be created directly in the 3D graphics panel or from the *Face Group* geometry properties panel. In this tutorial, we will utilize the first approach.

Select the inlet face by holding

`CTRL`button and clicking on the geometry face in a 3D view. The selection should be marked in redClick on the

*Face Group*button in the graphics context toolbarPress

`Esc`key to clear the selection

## 9. Creating Face Groups (II)

Next, rotate the view in such a way that you will be able to see the second end of the geometry.

Select the outlet face by holding

`CTRL`button and clicking on the geometry faceClick on the

*Face Group*button in the graphics context toolbar

## 10. Rename Face Groups

In the *Geometry Panel* we can find three *Face Groups* under the *tesla_valve* geometry. The first group, named default, contains all non-selected surfaces. These surfaces will constitute the walls of the valve. The two additional groups represent the inlet and outlet of the fluid domain. We will rename those groups to make the resulting boundary names more readable.

Select

*tesla_valve*geometryExpand

*Geometry Faces*Change face groups names accordingly

*group_1*\(\rightarrow\)*left*

*group_2*\(\rightarrow\)*right*

## 11. Meshing Parameters - Tesla Valve

In order to create the mesh, we need to specify geometries features used during the meshing process.

Go to

*Hex Meshing*panelSelect the

*tesla_valve*componentEnable

*Mesh Geometry*Enable

*Create Boundary Layer Mesh*Set

*No. of Layers*to*2*Set

*First Layer Thickness*to*0.5*

(by default first cell size value is the relative size, in this case, the program will generate a boundary layer with a height equal to half of the original near wall cell)Select all

*Face Groups*for*Boundary Layer Mesh*

## 12. Base Mesh - Domain

We are going to create a mesh for a 2D fluid flow problem. The *Plate* base mesh is best suited for this purpose. This base mesh type will automatically take care of preparing appropriate boundaries for Z-direction.

Go to

*Base*tabSelect the

*Plate*as a*Base Mesh Type*Click on

**Autosize**Define the number of divisions

*Division**400**80*

## 13. Material Point

Material Point tells the meshing algorithm on which side of the geometry the mesh is to be retained. Since we are considering flow inside the mold we need to place the material point inside the geometry.

Go to

*Point*tabSpecify location inside

*tesla_valve*geometry

*Material Point**0.03**0**0*

You can specify the point location from the 3D view. Hold the `CTRL` key and drag the arrows to the destination.

## 14. Start Meshing

Everything is now set up for meshing.

Switch to

*Mesh*tabStart the meshing process with

**Mesh**button

## 15. Check Mesh

After the meshing process is finished the mesh should appear in the graphics window.

Set the XY orientation

**View XZ**Click

**Fit View**

## 16. Boundary Coupling (I)

In this tutorial, we are simulating a valve consisting of an infinite number of segments, where the mesh represents only one segment. In this situation, fluid flow can be driven only by body forces or pressure difference between inlet and outlet (the same across all segments). We can assume, that the velocity field in each segment is the same along the whole valve. Therefore outlet from one segment will be an inlet to the next one, and the velocity profile from one boundary should be mapped onto the next one. This kind of constraint is usually called *periodic boundary condition* or *periodic coupling* . We can distinguish two main types of periodic coupling:

*cyclic*- all faces on one boundary match exactly the faces on the second boundary*cyclic AMI*- couples pair of boundaries, where communication between boundaries is performed using arbitrary mesh interface (AMI) interpolation. Boundaries have to be conforming only in the sense of shape

During the meshing process, we have not enforced conformity of meshes on the *left* and *right* boundary. Therefore, we cannot assume that faces on the left boundary are exactly matching the faces on the right boundary. Therefore, in this case, we should use the cyclic AMI boundary coupling.

## 17. Boundary Coupling (II)

Now we will create AMI coupling between the left and the right side of the valve segment.

Hold

`CTRL`key and select both*tesla_valve_left*and*tesla_valve_right*boundariesClick the

*Cyclic AMI*

## 18. AMI Properties

Click on coupled boundary to display properties

Select

*Translational*transformSet the vector between left and right boundary

*Separation Vector**0.15**0**0*

## 19. Select Solver - SIMPLE

We want to analyze incompressible turbulent flow inside the tesla valve. For this purpose, we will use the SIMPLE (simpleFoam) solver.

Select

**Steady State**typeSelect

**Incompressible**flow filterSelect

*SIMPLE*solver**Select**solver

## 20. Turbulence

We are going to use the standard *\(k{-}\omega \; SST\)* model to handle turbulence.

Go to

*Turbulence*panelSelect

*RANS*modelingSelect

*\(k{-}\omega \; SST\)*model

## 21. Transport Properties - Water

As a fluid material, we will use water.

Go to

*Transport Properties*panelOpen

**Material Database**Pick up

*water*from the listClick

**Apply**

Selecting material from the **Material Database** will fill all inputs in the *Transport Properties* panel. At any time we will still be able to overwrite these values.

## 22. Solution - SIMPLE

We will also modify the solver configuration what will increase the stability of the computational process.

Go to

*Solution*panelSwitch to the

*SIMPLE*tabIncrease the

*Non-Orthogonal Correctors*to*5*

This option usually improves stability and convergence but at an additional computational cost due to solving pressure equations multiple times.

## 23. Solution - Residuals

We will decrease residual levels for pressure. We do not need to decrease the residual level for other variables because the pressure equation is usually the one converging last.

Switch to the

*Residuals*tabChange the pressure residual to

*p**1e-05*

## 24. Solution - Limits

*Velocity Dumping* can prevent the solver from diverging even if nonphysical velocity would appear during the iterations.

Switch to the

*Limits*tabCheck the

*Velocity Damping*

## 25. Boundary Conditions

We are simulating one segment of a periodic geometry, where values at the inlet and outlet of the domain are bounded by the cyclic constraint. In this case, we can not force fluid flow by using a standard approach, but we will use pressure jump instead. This boundary condition will force constant pressure difference between coupled boundaries.

Go to

*Boundary Conditions*panelSelect

*tesla_valve_left*boundarySet the pressure type and jump value accordingly

*p Type**Fixed Jump AMI*

*p Jump \({\sf [m^2 / s^2]}\)**-100*

If, after changing boundary condition type to *Fixed Jump AMI* you do not see the *Jump* input field then move to the *tesla_valve_right* boundary, where this input will appear. In this case, you will have to apply the pressure difference with an opposite sign. The Jump value input appears only on *master* boundary, which is the first boundary in the coupling.

## 26. Monitors - Sampling (I)

During calculation, we can observe intermediate results on a section plane. To add sampling data on a plane we need to define plane properties and also select fields that will be sampled. Note that runtime post-processing can only be defined before starting calculations and can not be changed later on.

Go to

*Monitors*panelSwitch to

*Sampling*tabSelect

*Create Slice*Set slice plane location

*Point \({\sf [m]}\)**0.1**0**5e-04*

## 27. Monitors - Sampling (II)

Additionally, to specifying section plane geometry we need to choose which results should be sampled on the surface.

Expand

*Fields*listSelect pressure

*p*, velocity*U*and turbulence kinetic energy*k*

## 28. Run - Time Control

Finally, we can start our computation.

Go to

*RUN*panelSet the maximum

*Number of Iteration*to*10000*

## 29. Run - CPU

To speed up the calculation process increase the number of CPUs basing on your PC capability. The free version allows you to use only *2* processors in parallel mode. To get the full version, you can use the contact form to Request 30-day Trial

Estimated computation time for 2 processors: 3 minutes

Switch to

*CPU*tabUse

*parallel*modeIncrease the

*Number of processors*Click

**Run Simulation**button

## 30. Discretization - Convection

After preliminary calculation, we will continue with a more accurate algorithm. Change velocity discretization to the *Linear Upwind* scheme to minimize numerical diffusion affecting the results of the simulation.

Go to the

*Discretization*panelSwitch to

*Convection*tabClick on

*Upwind*to extend the listChange scheme to

*Linear Upwind*

## 31. Run - Continue Simulation

Move back to *Run* panel and continue calculation. Note we did not remove the previous result but we use them as a starting point for computation with a higher-order scheme.

Go to

*RUN*panelClick

**Continue Simulation**button

## 32. Residuals

When the calculation is finished we should see a similar residual plot. Note that we can see how residual values get up when we have changed the convection scheme. This is due to the fact that different numerical scheme results in slightly different discrete equations which do not match results from previous calculations.

## 33. Slice - Velocity Field

*Slices* tab appears next to the *Residuals* tab. Under this tab, we can preview results on the defined section plane.

Change tab to

*Slices*Select the velocity

*U*Click

*Adjust range to data*

## 34. Calculate - Mass Flow Rate

Finally, we will calculate what is the mass flow rate in the flow blocking direction.

Go to

*Calculate*panelSwitch to

*Boundary*tabSelect

*tesla_valve_left*boundaryChoose the

*\(\varphi\)*variableClick the

**Calculate**buttonRead the

*phi*value from the console

Results will be displayed in the console. The \(\phi\)φ variable is the flux through mesh faces. In the case of incompressible solvers, the flux is volumetric instead of mass flux. To obtain mass flow rate we have to multiply results by reference density.

## 35. Reset Result

In the next simulation, we will invert flow direction and once again compute the flow rate forced by the same pressure gradient.

Go back to

*RUN*panelClick

**Reset Calculation**button. This will remove current results and allow to change setting for the second simulation

## 36. Reset Discretization Setup

We need to change the higher-order *Linear Upwind* scheme back to *Upwind* . This scheme will be again used for initial calculation since it is less accurate but more stable.

Go to

*Discretization*panelSwitch to

*Convection*tabExpand the scheme list for

*U*Change scheme to

*Upwind*

## 37. Boundary Conditions -Inverse Pressure Gradient

In the second run, we will investigate the results with fluid moving in the opposite direction.

Go to

*Boundary Conditions*panelSelect the

*tesla_valve_left*boundarySet the

*Jump*value to*100*

## 38. Run - Second Simulation

We leave the rest of the configuration unchanged. Now we can start the new calculation.

Go to

*RUN*panelClick

**Run Simulation**button

## 39. Discretization - Convection (2nd Case)

Again, after preliminary calculation, we will continue with a more accurate algorithm.

Go to

*Discretization*panelSwitch to

*Convection*tabExpand the scheme list for

*U*Change scheme to

*Linear Upwind*

## 40. Run - Continue Calculation (2nd Case)

Move back to *Run* panel and continue calculation.

Go to

*RUN*panelClick

**Continue Simulation**button

## 41. Residuals (2nd Case)

When the calculation is finished we should see a similar residual plot.

Switch to

*Residuals*tab

## 42. Slice - Velocity Field (2nd Case)

As previously change tab to Slices and display velocity field. Compare results with previous velocity field. We can see that the velocity level is much higher under the same pressure gradient, which indicates that this configuration results in much smaller resistance.

Change tab to

*Slices*Select the velocity

*U*Click

*Adjust range to data*Display the latest results by clicking

*End*button

## 43. Calculate - Mass Flow Rate (2nd Case)

Finally, we will calculate the mass flow rate for the second simulation and compare the results.

Go to

*Calculate*panelSwitch to

*Boundary*tabSelect

*tesla_valve_left*boundaryChoose the

*\(\varphi\)*variableClick the

**Calculate**buttonRead the

*phi*value from the console

The sign of mass flow rate defines the direction of the flow. This time the value is positive because fluid flows outside the domain. We are interested only in absolute values. Check the ratio of mass flow rates between the two simulations:

*\(Ratio = \frac{0.000115}{1.606e-005} \approx 7.2\)*

As we can see, the 7.2 times more fluid flowing through the valve when we apply a pressure difference in the forward direction. Note that this simulation is in 2D, which means that the valve is infinitely wide and does not account the resistance from the side walls.